by Marcus Schmahl | 2,5 / 5,0 | Approximate reading time: 3 Minutes
LANDR Fair Trade AI: Ethical AI or the exploitation of artists?

LANDR Fair Trade AI: Ethical AI or the exploitation of artists?  ·  Source: LANDR

ADVERTISEMENT

LANDR, the AI-powered music production platform, announces a new Fair Trade AI programme. This programme allows artists to earn recurring revenue by participating in the training of AI-powered music tools, and represents the first mature opt-in model for the music industry. This means royalties for musicians who train the AI with their music, which then creates similar music on that basis? Does this mean that we are abolishing the art itself, or is it a good idea to involve musicians in the process that is already underway? What do you think?

ADVERTISEMENT

Fair Trade AI: LANDR’s answer to the challenges of the music industry?

Since its launch 11 years ago, LANDR has been a leader in AI music production, serving more than 6 million artists and distributing music on Spotify, Apple Music and 150 other leading streaming services worldwide. With the launch of the Fair Trade AI programme, LANDR continues to lead the industry in upholding ethical AI practices and creating new monetisation opportunities for musicians.

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

Under the new Fair Trade AI programme, artists who make their songs available for AI training will receive 20% of the revenue generated by the tools trained on their music. This approach allows artists to continue to benefit from the development of AI while actively participating in the development of music production technologies, while retaining all rights to their music. Where does the other 80% of the revenue go?

Are you being paid fairly for your music?

Pascal Pilon, founder of LANDR, explains: “Our mission at LANDR is to enable musicians to be creative, to be heard and to monetise their work. With the emergence of new generative AI tools in the last year and the legal challenges ahead, we now see an opportunity to make this market exciting and safe for DIY musicians worldwide by developing tools that support, not replace, their creativity and workflow.”

LANDR’s Fair Trade AI programme respects copyright and content ownership and offers musicians a new way to benefit from the latest advances in AI. With over a decade of experience helping millions of musicians produce and publish music, LANDR has the combination of technology, content collection and distribution infrastructure to lead this new era in the industry.

LANDR’s Fair Trade AI: Real progress or just hype?

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how the Fair Trade AI programme works: musicians can sign up to the programme by submitting their music, distributed via LANDR, for AI training. Only tracks for which the user retains publishing rights are accepted, and LANDR reserves the right to curate the tracks added to the dataset.

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

Contributors receive monthly payments through their LANDR account, similar to streaming revenues. LANDR ensures that no part of the dataset is sold to third parties, protecting users’ music and ensuring that the data is used ethically and contributors are compensated appropriately.

Regular updates and reports on the AI training process and results are provided via email and the LANDR dashboard. In addition, LANDR provides extensive educational resources, including guides, webinars and tutorials to help users navigate the evolving landscape of AI in music.

Risks or opportunities for your music

According to LANDR, the new Fair Trade AI programme is an important step towards opening up new sources of income for musicians through the use of AI and supporting their creative work.

But how do you, as musicians and creatives, see this? Are you already working creatively with AI in the studio, or are you ignoring the new technologies that are supposed to help us find a faster workflow? Do you want to be part of this technology and improve AI with your input or are you already thinking about the value of art and music in the (near) future with AI? It’s a difficult topic, I think, and there are no right or wrong answers. I look forward to hearing your opinions in the comments!

What are my thoughts on AI in my own studio?

More information about LANDR and the Fair Trade AI programme

LANDR Fair Trade AI: Ethical AI or the exploitation of artists?

How do you like this post?

Rating: Yours: | ø:
ADVERTISEMENT

7 responses to “LANDR Fair Trade AI: Ethical AI or the exploitation of artists?”

    Ronald Vonk says:
    6

    Empower musicians worldwide? What a load of cr@p. They say 20% of their earnings go to contributors which I guess should be a lot. If I’m not mistaken AI is trained on humongous amounts of examples, so what do you get? A few cents? That’s empowerment for sure (NOT). Or am I missing something?

    Pietro says:
    14

    Taking advantage of the misery of what musical artist earn today thanks to streaming, proposing them to get paid peanuts for training an algorithm that will eventually replace them completely one day and sooner than later
    Why can’t these AI companies just FO and leave human creativity in peace ? And this is true for visual art too by the way. AI is just a great usurper feeding on human talent using powerful math to recreate it in infinite variations. Without humans, machines are nothing. Even if one day it can self-compose it will still be thanks to the initial seeds provided by humanity. An AI algo has no ears and does not know what emotion you can get from hearing a sound or melody. It’s all superb fakery promoted by greedy tech execs that are for the major part talentless and disconnected from humanity.

    Nathanael Davenport says:
    4

    The money for most artists will be peanuts. Money aside, I would have no interest in contributing my work to a glorified silicon parrot.

    James says:
    4

    What is up with the shill survey at the end of this article? The options are either “I love ai” or “I’m scared”.

    Moulin says:
    1

    Artists, stay away of AI! You will be out of business sooner than you think! One does not have to be a genius to understand this simple logic.

    Dennis Weldon says:
    0

    I think it’s good for music production
    But I wonder does it take your idea and use it for someone else’s project ?
    I had that happen some production company’s take your idea and change parts of the melodies and then copyright them.

    Lu says:
    0

    Just delegalize djs and music will be fine for the next centuries. It’s that simple.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *